BLOGGER TEMPLATES AND TWITTER BACKGROUNDS �

Saturday, March 26, 2011

Arguments: Hip-Hop and the Corporate Function of Colonization

Jared Ball’s argument in his article “Hip-Hop and the Corporate Function of Colonization” is that there are definite efforts by the people and businesses in power to stay that way. He says that there is a definite control by these large organizations and corporations over the population’s cultural expression. The people that are in power set up structures and boundaries to maintain the status quo. Not only do the margins maintain the norm, they also protect the ruling elite. These boundaries are rigid and strict to prevent people from overstepping them.
Another one of Ball’s main points is how anonymous these elite structures. Faceless CEOs and share holders make rules and decisions. Ball even goes on to call spokespeople and CEOs “modern day colonial administrators”. By having things remain the way they are and manipulating what is considered acceptable, the ruling class gain safety and security. There is no reason for them to worry about any deviations from their set up system. In order to maintain this position, a popular consciousness or “manufactured opinion” (as Ball puts it) are needed to support them.
If people were free to create a new culture or behavior that became massively accepted and popular, that would mean the end of established power. Another way this is controlled is by allowing only carefully selected forms of culture to be promoted. This way, it appears as though a new culture is emerging but those in power still have a hold on its mass appeal and influence. Anyone who goes against this established power are suppressed, demonized, or harassed. Hip-hop culture is constantly under scrutiny for its explicit music, “violent” lifestyle, and aggressive themes.
Mass media has a huge part in this because many of the ruling elite control forms of popular media. In his article, Ball explains that the function of mass media is to influence audience behavior by controlling this idea of popular consciousness. He goes on to list modern examples of how this is being done. His examples include the lobbying of Congress by Time Warner to increase postal rates for magazines, EMI’s efforts to sell itself to either Warner Music Group or a private equity firm, the Copyright Royalty Board charging both commercial and noncommercial broadcasters a royalty fee per song, and Interscope Records’ lyrics committee that refused to include the track “Fuck Tha Police” on Young Buck’s new album. These examples show how those in power are staying in power. In the cases of the postal rate increases and the per song royalty fees, smaller businesses are being forced to close because they simply do not have the funds. This is allowing the large corporations to overpower the smaller ones and stay ruling.
By not allowing for any different opinions, those in power are attempting to create mindless societies who all have the same likes and dislikes. Anything different from the status quo is ostracized or punished. Dominant ideologies are not only kept in place but are also not challenged in any way for fear of the repercussions. Smaller businesses cannot survive because they are crushed by large corporations. We are told to listen to nameless, faceless people because it is what everyone else is doing.
Talking Point:
I am not sure that I really grasped the concept of this article. While I tried, I feel as though there are still some points that I simply just missed or did not understand. I hope that in class we can talk more about the article so that I can find out what my classmates thought.

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Connections: Glee to Grinner and Raby Pieces

While the television show, Glee, claims to be raising awareness on issues teenagers face and changing the way we view teenagers as a society, it is still stuck in stereotypical depictions of its characters and dominant ideologies in its themes. The show does bring light to some issues and does try to offer advice or a solution to the problems teens are facing. But it also is laden with stereotypical depictions of so many of its characters. There are the jocks and cheerleaders who are mean, stupid, and only concerned with being popular and having sex. (“How is it that we date the only two girls in high school that don’t put out”-Finn, Never Been Kissed) Kurt, the one gay character, speaks in an overly feminine voice, wears really extravagant clothing, and prefers to hang out with the girl members of the club. (This is exemplified in Never Been Kissed when he has to be told yet again that he is on the boy’s side for battle of the sexes) Then there is the one handicapped character who is treated like a community service project by the equally stereotypical bad boy character. It seems as though Glee takes one step forward but two steps back with these characters.

Leslie Grinner’s SCWAAMP framework can easily be applied to this TV show. Almost every character, except one, is straight and both Never Been Kissed and Furt exemplify this. For the most part, all of the kids in the club are paired off into heterosexual couples. In Never Been Kissed, Coach Beiste is tortured from her high school years and the fact that she has never been kissed nor had the picture perfect relationship with a man. In Furt, the focus of the episode is the heterosexual wedding of Finn’s mom and Kurt’s dad. Sam also gives Quinn a promise ring in this episode, symbolizing yet another heterosexual tradition.

In terms of Christian ideology, this was also present in the episodes. Some of the girls seem to be saving themselves for marriage and are shown wearing cross necklaces. Also, the wedding between Kurt’s dad and Finn’s mom is officiated by some sort of a priest. Whiteness as the norm is also present in this show. While there are a few non-White characters, one black girl and two Asian people, the cast is predominantly White. Even though there are characters with different ethnicities they are not really the main characters or the focus of the stories. All of the characters are able-bodied except for one. He is shown as a community service project in Never Been Kissed. I do have to applaud Glee though because, for the most part, Artie is a part of the dance numbers and is perfectly capable of keeping up with the rest of his peers.

All of the characters in the three episodes were American and there was really no depiction of anything non-American. Male dominance is definitely represented on this show. The girls’ entire status and being are dependent on their boyfriends. In order to become popular, the girls find the most popular guy (the football players mostly) and start dating him. In Never Been Kissed, the girls dumb themselves down in order for Puck to like them. The only aspect of the SCWAAMP framework that cannot really be applied is property holding. None of the students really have property besides Puck and Artie when they collect money for singing.

Elements of Raby’s discourses are also present on Glee. The “Storm”, “Becoming”, and “At Risk” are depicted because the teenagers on the show are shown as being experimental, risk taking, and uncertain of who they are. The boys and girls are experimenting with sex in the Never Been Kissed episode and I’m sure they experiment with drugs and/or alcohol in other episodes (I do not watch the show on a regular basis so I can only assume). These also tie in with the risk taking factor. Tina and Mike take this riskiness to a different level when they do into a classroom to fool around. In the episode, Furt, the boys take a risk when they stand up to the school bully and end up in a violent altercation. Quinn is shown as uncertain of what she wants in terms of a boyfriend, Kurt is uncertain of his place in the school and with his identity, and the school bully is uncertain of his sexuality (shown when he kisses Kurt in the locker room).


This article further emphasizes the stereotypes in the show.


Points to Share: I wonder what the other members of the class think about these obvious stereotypes. I also wonder if they think Glee has the potential to ever accomplish it's goals of being more open and honest about teenagers or if these depictions have set them too far back. Also, I question whether or not people are really bothered by these stereotypical characters or if they simply take them at face value as characters on an entertaining show.

Monday, March 21, 2011

GLEE Response

Hi all!
Sorry this week has been insane and continues to be that way. I have not had a chance to do my response to the GLEE episodes yet but I promise that they will be up shortly. Sorry for the delay!

Sunday, March 6, 2011

My Digital Life

Hi everyone,
So here is my digital life project. I tried to embed it but half of the screen was getting cut off so I am including the link instead. I hope you enjoy it!

Click for Youtube link